Plain language summary
Multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) formulations are the most common dietary supplement. Numerous adults continue to take MVMs for general health and well-being or to reduce the risk of chronic diseases despite inconsistency among observational studies examining long-term MVM use and risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to test the effects of a common MVM in the prevention of cancer and CVD among women and men. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that a daily MVM did not reduce the primary outcome of total invasive cancer. Furthermore, MVM supplementation did not have a significant effect on the secondary outcomes of total cardiovascular events, CVD death, or all-cause mortality. Authors conclude that their findings do not support the regular use of MVMs for cancer or CVD prevention among generally healthy older men and women. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of long-term MVM use on nutritional status and the balance of risks and benefits on cancer, CVD, and other aging-related outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although older adults commonly take multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) supplements to promote health, evidence on the use of daily MVMs on invasive cancer is limited. OBJECTIVES The study objective was to determine if a daily MVM decreases total invasive cancer among older adults. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of a daily MVM and cocoa extract for prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y) free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was from June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the MVM intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to daily MVM or placebo. The primary outcome was total invasive cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Secondary outcomes included major site-specific cancers, total CVD, all-cause mortality, and total cancer risk among those with a baseline history of cancer. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, invasive cancer occurred in 518 participants in the MVM group and 535 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.09; P = 0.57). We observed no significant effect of a daily MVM on breast cancer (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.42) or colorectal cancer (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.12). We observed a protective effect of a daily MVM on lung cancer (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.92). The composite CVD outcome occurred in 429 participants in the MVM group and 437 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.12). MVM use did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.08). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS A daily MVM supplement, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of total cancer among older men and women. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of MVMs on other aging-related outcomes among older adults. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
5
Allocation concealment
:
Yes
